In February, executives from OpenAI visited Los Angeles, hoping to strike offers with main Hollywood studios. They left empty handed. The studios declined partnerships to make use of Sora, the corporate’s AI–powered video era device, Bloomberg reported, citing issues over how OpenAI would use their information and potential backlash from unions frightened about job losses following the 2023 Hollywood strikes.
OpenAI’s failure to win over Hollywood exposes a deeper difficulty for the corporate: It appears unwilling to show it may work throughout the contracts, licensing agreements, and labor protections which have ruled the leisure enterprise for greater than a century. OpenAI isn’t simply alienating the $100 billion-plus leisure enterprise—it’s lacking a chance to indicate different industries that it’s able to constructing viable, long-term partnerships.
OpenAI’s Hollywood misadventure is harking back to an earlier dispute between the media trade and Silicon Valley. Within the early 2000s, Napster appeared poised to upend the music trade by providing customers an unprecedented digital catalog of songs. The service grew to become a cultural phenomenon, however it was predicated on distributing unlicensed (stolen) music, and the corporate’s refusal to interact with copyright legislation proved pricey in the long term. Main labels sued, and by the point Napster realized it was higher off negotiating licensing offers, it was too late. The music trade had moved on, choosing sustainable agreements with companies equivalent to Rhapsody, iTunes, and finally Spotify. OpenAI’s know-how is way extra transformative than Napster’s, however its story may look the identical.
Like Napster, OpenAI fails to see that working with established industries is the higher path to long-term development. As a substitute of participating with creators, OpenAI has scraped information articles, ingested whole libraries of books with out securing rights, and launched a voice assistant that sounded loads like Scarlett Johansson (who had beforehand denied permission). Amid criticism across the Johansson case, OpenAI claimed the voice belonged to a unique unnamed actress and carried on. That technique—transfer quick, ask for permission later—might have labored thus far to make OpenAI the dominant participant in generative AI, however it’s not sustainable.
Studio-friendly AI
As Napster did, OpenAI is opening the door for the movie trade to accomplice with AI corporations that respect its mental property. Lionsgate introduced a partnership with Runway to construct a proprietary AI mannequin educated solely on the studio’s catalog. The ensuing mannequin shall be totally clear and managed—Lionsgate is aware of precisely what IP is getting used and may distribute income internally or reinvest it. Equally, James Cameron has teamed with StabilityAI to convey AI to particular results, and veteran movie govt Peter Chernin joined with Andreessen Horowitz to launch an AI-native studio, Promise.
These ventures differ from OpenAI in that they’re both coaching fashions solely on licensed information, utilizing AI in slim, artist-controlled pipelines or constructing new studios with Hollywood’s direct involvement. By insisting on management and never acknowledging filmmakers’ issues, OpenAI might finally discover itself on the skin trying in.
OpenAI ought to be taught from different tech corporations that after noticed regulation as an impediment however later realized the advantages of cooperation—typically after bruising fights with regulators. For instance, Uber touted itself as a “disruptor,” but it will definitely labored with metropolis governments together with London and Washington, D.C. to safe municipal contracts and bolster market belief.
OpenAI nonetheless has time to persuade legacy industries that it may respect mental property rights, information privateness, and labor guidelines.
As a primary step, OpenAI ought to supply extra transparency round its AI coaching information, serving to studios and unions perceive what copyrighted materials is getting used. A content material provenance system that traces AI-generated outputs like scripts or performances wouldn’t require the mannequin to be totally disclosed. OpenAI, studios, and creators may depend on third-party audits to certify that the fashions had been developed with agreed-upon information restrictions and requirements. This may be completed whereas nonetheless defending proprietary data.
OpenAI also needs to comply with share income with rights holders in a roundabout way. A Spotify-style royalty system will not be replicable for movie, however the core concept of a inventive fund continues to be viable—particularly in managed instances like Runway’s cope with Lionsgate. The concept isn’t to pay per use, however to license pre-approved datasets and share income tied to the movies derived from that content material.
OpenAI in Hollywood
There’s an actual alternative in bundling information: OpenAI may undertake the same mannequin utilizing licensed bundles of copyrighted content material, developed in partnership with unions and particular person studios. Even a restricted system would reveal a willingness to collaborate. The best threat for OpenAI isn’t in getting the small print flawed—it’s in doing nothing whereas rivals transfer forward.
On this vein, it’s in OpenAI’s greatest curiosity to interact extra broadly with Hollywood—not simply studios, however labor and creators. The 2023 strikes confirmed that unions form public narratives and coverage, and any long-term technique should mirror that. Funneling a portion of AI-driven income to trade professionals would sign an intent to work with, not round, human expertise. This sort of initiative may reframe AI as a inventive accomplice, not a menace, and assist OpenAI stand other than opaque general-purpose fashions.
Final month, greater than 400 Hollywood creatives despatched a letter to the White Home, arguing that AI corporations ought to observe copyright legislation like some other trade: “There is no such thing as a purpose to weaken or get rid of the copyright protections which have helped America flourish,” the letter stated. The longer OpenAI waits to behave, the extra it opens the door for others to take action first.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially mirror the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
This story was initially featured on Fortune.com
