As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face rising complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry important accountability for guaranteeing robust monetary outcomes for contributors​1. In 2025, plan sponsors should give attention to optimizing funding methods, decreasing prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embrace vital areas equivalent to goal date fund choice, payment transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation traits.
Focusing on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steering, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines greatest practices for TDF selection2. Key takeaways embrace:
Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluate
Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
Profiting from all accessible info within the evaluate and decision-making course of
Documenting the method
Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steering are three key factors to contemplate. First, as with every funding course of, you will need to perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by accumulating workforce demographics, funding behavioral traits — generally present in experiences produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce knowledge. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and general funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding choices requires these components to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which might be appropriate on your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Lessons
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes via the hassle of discovering a terrific funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor would possibly choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio contains revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, quite than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different circumstances, a plan is likely to be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Usually, these decisions or oversights lead to plan contributors paying increased funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We propose plan sponsors contemplate the influence on contributors of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We advocate plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply higher payment transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding opinions comply with an analogous format: a take a look at the economic system and capital markets adopted by a evaluate of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, modifications are mentioned. Whereas routine opinions of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic evaluate of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re applied with lively administration or passive administration. We propose any such evaluate not less than each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Common Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the prevailing funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes must be altered. Elements for the dialogue might embrace participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Training Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Research, staff reported spending not less than three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that staff’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We now have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages will help staff enhance their monetary well being and scale back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a major position — notably for workforces the place a big share of the inhabitants is just not at a desk – there’s a significant improve within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff on the lookout for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Tasks
Employment traits from “the nice resignation” to “the large keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of right now’s workforce. These modifications additionally negatively influence an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes would possibly fluctuate from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
Doc the committee construction and obligations
Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand new committee members
Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Traits in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement applications can include tax laws, so it will likely be vital for plan sponsors to remain present on potential modifications.
From a litigation standpoint, two main traits formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary obligation to watch plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the providers offered? It is very important observe that this subject covers each vendor bills, equivalent to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, equivalent to alternative of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has centered on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to cut back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different traits in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal position in shaping the monetary way forward for tens of millions of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they will improve retirement outcomes and scale back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making shall be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant influence in 2025 and past​.
Disclosures
The fabric introduced herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info is just not assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution is just not registered as a municipal advisor beneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
