In This Article
Brief-term landlords would possibly not have the opportunity to sh-sh-shake it off with regards to the extra taxes they could be responsible for. This follows the introduction of Rhode Island’s “Taylor Swift tax,” the nickname given to part-time residents who personal trip leases.
With different states following swimsuit, tensions are escalating between native municipalities, brokers, brokers, and the rich property homeowners they characterize.
What’s the Taylor Swift Tax?
The so-called Taylor Swift tax—formally referred to as the Non-Proprietor-Occupied Property Tax Act—will take impact on July 1, 2026. It imposes an annual surcharge on non-primary residences (i.e., properties not occupied by their homeowners or tenants for not less than 183 days a 12 months) that are valued at greater than $1 million.
The surcharge is about at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed worth above that threshold. Utilizing these metrics, Kiplinger calculated {that a} $3 million property would face a surcharge of roughly $10,000 yearly, along with common property taxes.
The tax was named after the pop famous person as a result of Swift bought a mansion within the upscale Watch Hill part of Rhode Island in 2013, the place she is a part-time resident. It’s estimated that she might be liable for an additional $136,000 yearly when the brand new tax takes impact.
Proponents and Opponents
The aim of the extra levy, in accordance with the state, is to increase income that helps housing initiatives whereas lowering the variety of residences that stay vacant for a lot of the 12 months. Within the case of short-term landlords, this might be devastating to their backside line, as they might not solely be taxed on the income they make as a landlord, but in addition from the Taylor Swift tax too, in the event that they lease the house for greater than 183 days a 12 months however not as a long-term rental.
The brand new tax has not been effectively obtained by many inside the true property trade. “These are individuals who simply come right here for the summer time, spend their cash, and pay their fair proportion of taxes,” Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s Worldwide in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, informed CNBC. “They’re getting penalized simply because additionally they stay someplace else.”
“You’re simply hurting the individuals who help small enterprise,” Lori Joyal of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill, informed CNBC. “You’re chasing away the individuals who spend many of the cash in these cities.”
Brokers worry that the tax may backfire on trip householders, who would possibly select to spend their cash on close by trip cities with much less stringent tax legal guidelines.
Different States Are Implementing Related Taxes
Montana
Montana just lately handed reforms set to take impact in 2026, which equally distinguish between main residences and long-term leases versus secondary/trip properties and short-term leases. The state skilled an inflow of recent residents from New York and different main cities throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Montana’s new system would require non-primary residents and short-term rental homeowners to pay a flat charge of 1.90% starting in 2026, whatever the property worth. Nonetheless, properties used as main residences or for long-term leases can qualify for decrease, tiered charges, relying on market values, in accordance with the Montana Division of Income.
There are caveats to Montana’s program. Owners who stay of their residences for not less than seven months of the 12 months, or have long-term leases, might qualify for diminished charges and a one-time rebate for 2025, in accordance with tax compliance website Avalara. The positioning additionally estimates that second properties and higher-value properties will bear a higher proportion of the tax burden as a consequence of their increased tax charges.
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Cape Cod is contemplating becoming a member of close by Rhode Island in taxing prosperous part-time residents. Nonetheless, fairly than an annual tax, Cape Cod will apply a “mansion tax” within the type of a 2% actual property switch tax on gross sales of over $2 million. Proponents argue that it may generate round $56 million yearly for reasonably priced and year-round housing.
Rob Brennan, chief authorized officer on the nonprofit group Housing Help, informed Cape Cod’s native authorities web site:
“This is now not a cyclical scarcity—it’s an existential disaster. With out a everlasting, predictable supply of funding, we can’t help housing that working Cape Codders can really afford. There’s no means out of this disaster with out daring, systemic options. The $2,000,000 residence changing into $2,040,000 doesn’t cease second-home consumers.”
Conversely, full-time residents in Chatham, Cape Cod, will obtain a 35% property tax exemption as of July 1, 2026.
“The huge quantity of wealth on this city in residential property is held by a disproportionate quantity of people that aren’t residents of this city,” Chatham group board member Seth Taylor informed the Cape Cod Chronicle. “I don’t assume it’s an excessive amount of to ask to have a look at this as a practical means to assist the middle-income of us that we are saying we wish to have in our group.”
Chatham and 10 different communities on the Cape and islands, in addition to six different cities and cities throughout the state, together with Boston, have adopted a residential tax exemption.
California
Los Angeles’ “mansion tax,” referred to as Measure ULA, imposes a 4% switch tax on property gross sales between $5 million and $10 million, and a 5.5% tax on gross sales above $10 million to help reasonably priced housing and homeless prevention packages. Nonetheless, the tax has just lately been underneath scrutiny and will be eradicated to encourage growth.
“It was bought as a mansion tax, which implies massive homes for wealthy folks, however it really had a chilling impact on housing building, notably flats,” former Meeting Speaker Bob Hertzberg, who was tapped by Mayor Karen Bass to work out the small print of the legislative proposal, informed the Los Angeles Occasions.
You may additionally like
Issues Brief-Time period Rental Homeowners Ought to Preserve In Thoughts
Should you personal a short-term rental in states like Rhode Island or Montana, you’ll need to pay explicit consideration to:
The variety of days you reside within the property personally as a main residence versus the times you lease it.
Preserve data of residency use dates versus short-term and mid-term rental occupancy.
Weigh the revenue generated from the rental versus the tax payable by not occupying it to qualify for residency restrictions to calculate the perfect use of your property.
Remaining Ideas: Grey Areas
I might by no means advocate discovering methods to bypass the brand new guidelines, however there are some grey areas that astute traders may benefit from.
Should you stay in a piece of your private home whereas additionally utilizing it as a short-term rental, your tax legal responsibility might be decided based mostly on the proportion of the home you occupy. In actuality, it’s unlikely that an IRS consultant will go to to confirm the apportioned use of your rental.
If sure areas, such because the kitchen and TV areas, are collectively used, their delineation turns into much more opaque. Throw ADUs, completed basements, and attics into the combination, and who lives in what elements of the property presents an fascinating proposition for an accountant who is aware of how far to bend the foundations.
Conversely, and fewer seemingly to attract consideration, is to merely ramp up your short-term revenue as a lot as potential whereas benefiting from renovation and depreciation tax deductions. Pay the brand new taxes as required, and revel in a superb night time’s sleep.
